Conus coronatus and Conus frigidus Venom: A New Source of Conopeptides with Analgesic Activity

- - - -

PMID: 32695281 (PubMed) - PMCID: PMC7368110 - View online: PubReader
Volume 12, Issue 3, July-September 2020, Page 179 to 185
Saturday, April 20, 2019 :Received , Saturday, April 11, 2020 :Accepted

• Rajabi , Halimeh Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran, Tel: +98 9166313458; E-mail: halimeh.rajabi@gmail.com
  - Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology , Khorramshahr, Iran

• Zolgharnein, Hossein
  - Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology , Khorramshahr, Iran

• Ronagh , Mohammad Taghi
  - Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology, Khorramshahr, Iran

• Amiri Moghaddam , Jamshid
  - Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology- Hans Knöll Institute, Jena, Germany

• Crüsemann , Max
  - Institute for Pharmaceutical Biology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Cone snails are a group of marine invertebrates with about 803 poisonous species ^1,2 which produce highly toxic venoms for defense and preying. These venoms are mixtures of bioactive peptide compounds with molecular weights of less than 5 kDa ^3-6 secreted by cells of the venom apparatus which is an appendage of the snail’s digestive system ^7-9. In addition, other tissues such as salivary glands contain poisonous compounds that contribute to the venom content ¹⁰. Cone snails often inject small amounts of venoms (about 5 μl), which usually consist of a complex combination of conotoxins as a defensive mechanism against hunters. The conotoxins are interesting candidates as drug leads ^11,12 involved in analgesic, antiepileptic, epilepsy, cardio and neuroprotective activity and myocardial infarction ^4,13-16. Conotoxins are structurally diverse and classified according to three schemes: the ER signal sequence similarities of the conotoxin precursors (gene superfamilies), the cysteine patterns of mature conotoxins and their disulfide connections (cysteine frameworks), and finally the specificities to pharmacological targets (pharmacological families).

Currently, 28 super-gene families are described. The pharmacological targets of some conotoxins have been identified ^14,17. Although several hundred conotoxins are reported from Conus species, few of them have been characterized for their potential pain-relieving roles. This potential is related to the high potency of conotoxins to specifically block individual types of excitable channels on nerve cells, some of which give rise to pain states ¹⁴. Some of the analgesic conotoxins studied to date are: i) α-conotoxins; ImI and ImII from Conus imperialis (C. imperialis) ¹⁸, ii) µ
-conotoxins; CnIIIC from Conus consors (C. consors) ⁴, GIIIA from Conus geographus (C. geographus) and PIIIA from Conus purpurascens (C. purpurascens) ¹⁹, iii) ω‐conotoxin; SVIB from Conus striatus (C. striatus), GVIA from Conus geographus (C. geographus) and MVIIA from Conus magus (C. magus). The pain killer "Ziconotide", derived from ω‐conotoxin MVIIA, was approved in December 2004 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ²⁰. Due to various pharmacological activities and the large structural diversity, conotoxins represent a valuable source for the discovery of novel drug leads ^10,21,22. Here, an attempt was made to explore the therapeutic potential of cone snail venom from the Iranian coast, which remains a largely uninvestigated source for these toxins.

C. coronatus and C. frigidus are dominant species on Qeshm Island, in the northern part of the Persian Gulf (Figure 1) ²³ but to our knowledge, there is no study about analgesic activity of these species. Thus, our goal was to collect the venom of these cone snail species and investigate their chemical and pharmacological properties.

Sample collection: Thirty-nine specimens of C. coronatus and twenty-five specimens of C. frigidus with total length of about 2.4±0.2 and 5.4±1.2 cm, respectively were collected from coastal waters of Zeyton Park in Qeshm Island (Location: N 26055.631; E 056015.209, south of Iran) in September 2016. The specimens were kept alive in salt water and transferred to the biotechnology laboratory of Hormozgan University, Iran. Then, dissection and isolation of the venom duct was performed on sterile conditions. Venom ducts of each species were lyophilized separately and transferred on ice to the biotechnology laboratory of Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology, Iran for further procedures.

Conotoxin extraction: Conotoxin extraction was performed by addition of deoxygenated cold aqueous acetonitrile solution (40%) to the venom duct and homogenization (Homogenizer Silent Crusher, Heidolph, Germany) at 16,000×rpm for 5 min. Then, the mixture was centrifuged at 10,000×g for 20 min and the supernatant containing the conotoxins was lyophilized using freeze dryer (Model Christ, 2 alpha, Germany) for 24 hr at -56°C ⁹. The protein concentration was determined by using the Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) protein quantification method according to Bradford ²⁴.

Purification: Gel filtration: The first separation of the conotoxins was carried out using open gel filtration column chromatography. In order to prepare the column (2.5×90 cm), 10 g of Sephadex G-25 resin was suspended in 50 mM Tris buffer (pH=8.5). The column was equilibrated with 50 mM Tris buffer with pH=8.5. The flowthrough speed was set to 0.3 ml per min. After loading the lyophilized protein to the column, 2 ml of fractions were collected for 10 hr and then lyophilized again ²⁵.

RP-HPLC purification: Reverse-phase HPLC [Pump model; K-100, UV detector model 2550 and manual injector (Knauer, Germany)] was used for further purification of conotoxins. Next, 100 µl of the active fraction C2 was injected to a flow rate of 1 ml/min on an analytical C₁₈ column (Particle size: 5 µ, pore size: 300 Å, column size: 4.6×250 mm) (Coulter, USA). HPLC begins with 90% H₂O containing 0.05% TFA with a gradient to 100% acetonitrile containing 0.05% TFA over 90 min. The data was analyzed using ChromGate v 3.3.2 ⁹.

LC-ESI-MS analysis: Samples were analyzed by LC-ESI-MS on a micrOTOF-Q III mass spectrometer (Bruker) with ESI-source coupled with a HPLC Dionex UltiMate 3000 (Thermo Scientific) using a EC100/2 Nucleoshell RP18 Gravity 2.7 µm (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). MS data were acquired over a range from 100-3000 m/z in positive mode. The column temperature was 25°C and the LC conditions used were as follows; eluent A was water with 0.1% acetic acid, while eluent B was acetonitrile containing 0.1% acetic acid. A gradient of 0-60% of eluent B in 12 min with a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min was used. Analysis of the MS data was performed by Bruker Compass Data Analysis 4.1. Monoisotopic masses were compared with similar monoisotopic masses of the peptide sequences/structures which are recorded in ConoServer database (http:// www.conoserver.org/index.php?page=stats&tab=organisms). Additionally, detected masses were explored for possible fingerprints using "Search by peptide mass" located in the ConoServer database (http://www.cono-server.org/index.php?page=fingerprint) ¹⁷.

Analgesic test: Male mice in the weight range of 20-25 g were provided from Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences, and used further according to the guidelines for the care and maintenance of laboratory animals. Mice were kept in the animal house under specified conditions (light cycle of 12 hr darkness and 12 hr light, temperature of 23±2°C and humidity of 40-50%) and were fed by a special animal pellet.

Formalin test: Lyophilized crude extract and purified fractions were dissolved in deionized water. Intraperitoneal (IP) injection was performed using 100 µl of the crude extract (1 mg/kg dose), purified fractions (0.5 mg/kg dose), normal saline (negative control) and morphine (positive control, 2.5 mg/kg dose) per 10 g mouse weight. Seven mice were used in each experimental group. Each mouse was placed in a box with dimensions of 30×30×30 cm³. After one hour, 10 µl of formalin 2.5% per 10 g mouse weight was subcutaneously injected into the right paw of the mouse. Then, the pain response was assessed for one hour. Number of flinches and licking time were considered as pain response ^13,26,27.

Hot plate test: The thermal pain response was assessed 30 min after the injection and at intervals (0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min), then the latency was assessed, and compared with the base tolerance. Hot plate (RB200, Chengdu Taiment Techonology Inc, China) was used to test the thermal pain and the temperature was kept constantly at 55±1°C. Licking and jumping up were considered as response to the painful stimuli. If the reaction time is shorter, the heat pain is more severe. Seven mice were used in each experimental group. Each mouse was placed on a hot plate and the time response to the painful stimuli was measured. This amount was the baseline latency of animals. The test was performed in the following groups: normal saline (Negative control), fraction C2 (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg), nicotine (0.005, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg). Cut off time was considered to be about 60 s ^27,28.

Statistical analysis: Values were expressed as mean±SEM of seven animals in each group. All the data were statistically compared with the controls by one-way ANOVA, where p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software version 6.

Extraction and purification of conotoxins: In total, 3.2 mg of crude extract from C. coronatus and 2.6 mg from C. frigidus was yielded from the venom ducts. The crude extracts were purified using Sephadex G-25. Next, 85 fractions for C. coronatus with seven main peaks (C1-C7) and 61 fractions for C. frigidus with five main peaks (F1-F5) were collected over 10 h and their UV absorption was spectrometrically determined (Figure S1 and S2).

Due to the promising analgesic results (4.2 section), fraction C2 of C. coronatus was further purified by RP-HPLC (Figure S3). The collected subfractions of fraction C2 were analyzed using LC-ESI-MS and high molecular weight compounds were detected. The monoisotopic masses of the putative conotoxins are presented in table 1. None of the detected monoisotopic masses had been reported in ConoServer database before.

Analgesic test: To explore the analgesic effects of conotoxins in the crude extract, formalin test was used on mice and compared with control groups. Generally, in the first phase (acute phase) of formalin injection, the flinching and licking increased, and then gradually decreased. In the second phase (chronic phase), the flinching and licking increased again, peaking after 35-45 min. Finally, the flinching and licking decreased after 60 min (Figure 2).  As shown in figure 2, in mice which were injected with Conus extracts and morphine, both acute (first) and chronic (second) phases of pain decreased by 2.5 and 1.5 times, respectively (p<0.05) in comparison to the negative control group which was injected with normal saline.

To assess the analgesic effect of the purified fractions, a formalin test with an initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg was performed for seven fractions resulting from the partially purified extract (C1-C7) of C. coronatus and six fractions of C. frigidus (F1-F6). The results showed that the fractions of C2, C4, C6, C7, F5 and F6 had analgesic effects on the first phase of the formalin test. The fraction number C2 had the most analgesic effect compared to others in the first phase (Figure 3).

Interestingly, only fraction C2 could decrease the second pain phase significantly (p<0.05). All the other fractions could not substantially decrease the second pain phase of the formalin test and were similar to the control group (Figure 4).

Thermal pain test of fraction C2: Due to strong analgesic effects of fraction C2 in formalin test and available materials, a thermal pain test was performed on this fraction. Different doses of fraction C2 containing conopeptide (C2-A: 0.1 and C2-B: 0.005 mg/kg) and nicotine (N-A: 0.1, N-B: 0.005 and N-C: 0.0005 mg/kg) were applied. C2-A and N-A had a significant analgesic effect in the interval of 0-60 min. At time 0, the analgesic effect of C2-A was similar to the effect of N-A, and significantly different from the other doses. Also, at 15 and 30 min intervals, the analgesic effects were observed at this dose and until the end of the 30 min duration. The mice which were injected lower dosages of nicotine and C2 (N-B, N-C and C2-B) were similar to the negative control group that was injected with normal saline. Also, the analgesic effect of N-A remained until the end of the 60 min test period (Figure 5).

Basic in vivo pain research relies on animal experiments and these tests have led to many contributions to the medical progress. Due to the genetic differences in animals, their individual tolerance to pain varies, but the variations are lower than in other behavioral tests. In these experiments, electrical, thermal, mechanical and chemical stimuli are used, and the differences in pain expression are associated with nerve fibers as well as the molecular mechanisms and pharmacological and genetic manipulations ^29,30. In relation to chemical stimulants, different compounds can be used to evaluate the analgesic effects which are measurable by using behavioral scoring ^28,31.

The most common test using chemical stimuli is the formalin test. The benefit of the formalin test compared to other tests is the possibility of reviewing the period and duration of the pain (acute and inflammatory). Formalin primarily causes pain via the TRPA1 receptor which is a member of the TRP family of ion channels ^29,32.

In the present study, the formalin test was used on mice as the behavioral model, and the Conus extracts were injected IP. It should be noted that the intracranial and spinal injection represents a more specific binding to their individual receptors ^4,15,33. Pain response to formalin administration was biphasic, as expected (Figure 2). The mechanism of pain induced by formalin involves a set of central and peripheral factors. The first phase is a rapid response to environmental stimuli and the second phase is a result of inflammatory mediators and functional changes inducing central pain ^13,25,26,32. Administration of both Conus crude extracts led to less pain induced by formalin similar to the injection of morphine, which is comparable with the results of other studies on different cone snails ^4,34-36.

According to the pattern of pain in investigated mice, there were slight differences in pain models (in time) which are influenced by genetic factors ³⁷. Pain includes various stages and certain compounds are involved, including neurotransmitters and enzymes. Some of these compounds result in increased sensitivity and others reduce sensitivity to pain. An increase or decrease in the production of these compounds is influenced by genetics ³⁸. Moreover, many studies point to analgesic effects of different species of cone snails in different behavioral models. For example, in 2014, Tabaraki et al examined the effect of intrathecal injection of different doses of crude extract of Conus textile (C. textile) on formalin test and found that 10 ng of toxin had similar effects of morphine on pain relief in mice ¹⁵. In another study, Kumar et al measured the analgesic activity of Conus lentiginosus (C. lentiginosus) in a Tail Flick test and showed that the analgesic effect of the semi-purified venom of this species was three times more effective than Paracetamol ¹⁶. Therefore, in the current study, after analyzing the analgesic effects of the crude extract, purification of the extract was performed and the analgesic effects of the resulting fractions were also investigated.

Experiments on the analgesic activity of partially purified extracts of C. coronatus (C1-C7) and C. frigidus (F1-F6) showed that the fractions number C2, C4, C6, C7, F5 and F6 had an analgesic effect in the first phase (Figure 3) and only fraction number C2 was able to decrease the pain in the second phase, too (Figure 4). After IP injection to mice and formalin test, the μ-conotoxin KIIIA showed a significant decrease in licking and flinching of mice during both phases (similar to the fraction C2). This peptide was later found to block sodium channels ³⁰.

In the hot plate test, analgesic effects of the fraction C2 remained for 30 min (Figure 5). It has been reported that the analgesic effects of Conus regularis (C. regularis) conotoxin that was injected IP (at dose of 0.85 mg/kg) was still remaining for about 15 min, which corresponds to an N-type calcium channel blocking conotoxin ²⁵. Also, the same dose of nicotine had more analgesic effect. Compounds such as nicotine, which are agonists of the cholinergic receptor activities, have anti-inflammatory effects ³⁹. High doses may cause adverse effects in behavioral models. McIntosh et al reported that intracranial injection of 30 nmol mr10a conotoxin in hot plate test causes seizures. However, injection of 2 nmol had analgesic effects of about 39.5±13.5 S ⁴⁰.

ESI-MS analysis of the purified fraction C2 showed that seven peaks contained compounds with a molecular weight between 0.5 to 6.4 kDa. Other compounds in the fraction were probably secondary compounds that played a role in the maturation of conotoxin, or were small portions of protein precursor before maturity in the venom apparatus ^10,41. Heghinian and Mari ¹² reported that purified fractions of cone snail venom can contain several different peptides with different biological activities ^6,12. Based on the molecular weights obtained from LC-HR-ESI-MS analysis, compound of fraction C2 did not show similarity to any conotoxins in ConoServer database (Table 1), so they likely represent novel conotoxin structures that will be further isolated and analyzed in future studies.

The analgesic effects of C. coronatus and C. frigidus venom were observed in this study which directed us towards the goodpotential of therapeutic molecules. In future studies, more information about the conotoxin(s) with analgesic properties, their structure and function as well as their toxicity need to be obtained. Given that C. coronatus is one of the dominant species in the Persian Gulf, and is accessible for researchers, this is an attractive source for further research on conotoxins.

Special thanks go to Dr. Pascal Heimer (Institute for Pharmaceutical Biology, University of Bonn, Germany) for assisting in LC-ESI-MS analyses.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The study was ethically approved by the Ethics Committee of Abadan School of Medical Sciences, Ref: IRABADAN.UMS.REC 1395. 175.

The authors gratefully acknowledge the help and financial support of Abadan School of Medical Sciences (Grant number: 951062).

Larger Image High Resolution Figure 1. Sampling area for C. coronatus (bottom picture) and C. frigidus (upper picture) used in this study.

Larger Image High Resolution Figure 2. Subcutaneous injection of formalin in mice as a pain model in different mice groups; negative control (Normal saline), Conus extracts (1 mg/kg) and morphine as positive control (2.5 mg/kg). Different letters indicate significant differences between groups in the first and second phase of pain (p<0.05).  In the second phase of pain (Chronic phase), AUC (Area under curve) was calculated.

Larger Image High Resolution Figure 3. The comparison of number of flinches and licking time among different fractions of C. coronatus (C1-C7) and C. frigidus (F1-F6) with subcutaneous injection in mice with formalin in the first phase (7 mice were used for each group. Different symptoms indicate significant differences) (p<0.05).

Larger Image High Resolution Figure 4. Number of flinches and licking time as AUC is calculated among different fractions for the second phase of formalin test in C. coronatus (C1-C7) and C. frigidus (F1-F6). Seven mice were used for each group, Different symptoms indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

Larger Image High Resolution Figure 5. Thermal pain test of fraction C2 (C. coronatus) and nicotine (Positive control) with different dosages (mg/kg). Seven mice were used for each group and different letters indicate significant difference between groups (p<0.05).

Larger Image High Resolution Figure 1. Sampling area for C. coronatus (bottom picture) and C. frigidus (upper picture) used in this study.

Larger Image High Resolution Figure S1. Sephadex G-25 chromatogram of C. coronatus extract (220 nm).

Larger Image High Resolution Figure S2. Sephadex G-25 chromatogram of C. frigidus extract (220 nm).

Larger Image High Resolution Figure S3. RP-HPLC chromatogram of fraction C2 from C. coronatus

Larger Image High Resolution Figure S1. Sephadex G-25 chromatogram of C. coronatus extract (220 nm).

Larger Image High Resolution Figure 2. Subcutaneous injection of formalin in mice as a pain model in different mice groups; negative control (Normal saline), Conus extracts (1 mg/kg) and morphine as positive control (2.5 mg/kg). Different letters indicate significant differences between groups in the first and second phase of pain (p<0.05).  In the second phase of pain (Chronic phase), AUC (Area under curve) was calculated.

Larger Image High Resolution Figure S2. Sephadex G-25 chromatogram of C. frigidus extract (220 nm).

Larger Image High Resolution Figure 3. The comparison of number of flinches and licking time among different fractions of C. coronatus (C1-C7) and C. frigidus (F1-F6) with subcutaneous injection in mice with formalin in the first phase (7 mice were used for each group. Different symptoms indicate significant differences) (p<0.05).

Larger Image High Resolution Figure S3. RP-HPLC chromatogram of fraction C2 from C. coronatus

Larger Image High Resolution Figure 4. Number of flinches and licking time as AUC is calculated among different fractions for the second phase of formalin test in C. coronatus (C1-C7) and C. frigidus (F1-F6). Seven mice were used for each group, Different symptoms indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

Larger Image High Resolution Figure 5. Thermal pain test of fraction C2 (C. coronatus) and nicotine (Positive control) with different dosages (mg/kg). Seven mice were used for each group and different letters indicate significant difference between groups (p<0.05).

Larger Image Table 1. Summary of high-molecular weight peaks from C. coronatus C2