Effects of Combined Soy Isoflavone Extract and Docetaxel Treatment on Murine 4T1 Breast Tumor Model

- - - -

PMID: 25926948 (PubMed) - PMCID: PMC4388885 - View online: PubReader
Volume 7, Issue 1, January-March 2015, Page 16 to 21
Wednesday, June 11, 2014 :Received , Monday, July 14, 2014 :Accepted

• Hejazi, Ehsan
  - Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

• Nasrollahzadeh , Javad
  - Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

• Fatemi, Ramina
  - Reproductive Immunology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran

• Barzegar-Yar MohamadI, Leila
  - Monoclonal Antibody Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran

• Saliminejad, Kioomars
  - Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran

• Amiri, Zohre
  - Department of Basic Sciences and Cellular and Molecular Nutrition, School of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

• Kimiagar, Masoud
  - Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

• Houshyari, Mohammad
  - Department of Radiation Oncology, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

• Tavakoli, Maryam Reproductive Immunology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran, Tel: +98 21 22432020, Email: Tavakoli@avicenna.ac.ir
  - Reproductive Immunology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran

• Idali, Farah Reproductive Immunology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran, Tel: +98 21 22432020, Email: F.Ideali@avicenna.ac.ir
  - Reproductive Immunology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in females in the world. Conventional cancer therapies usually involve chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Chemotherapy is the use of cytotoxic anti-neoplastic drugs to treat several different types of tumors ¹. The emergence of drug resistance has brought major problems in chemotherapy ². Drug sensitivity of a tumor is influenced by a variety of aspects, including metabolism of the drug, receptor status of the tumor ³, genomic polymorphism ⁴ and  the effects of drug combinations ⁴. Docetaxel (Taxotere) is one of the chemotherapeutic agents that has been mostly used for treatment of breast cancer, alone or in combination with other agents ⁵.

Until now, few studies have investigated the role of nutrients in improvement of tumors sensitivity to drug resistance ⁶. Soy isoflavones belong to a family of nonnutritive compounds modulating a diversity of biological processes linked to carcinogenesis. Genistein, daidzein and glycitein are major isoflavones in soy products that comprise, respectively, 50, 40 and 10% of the total soybean isoflavone profile ⁷. Many different studies have investigated the effects of soy isoflavones on breast cancer in vitro and in vivo. Anti-tumor and anti-proliferative effects of isoflavones have been found in several studies ^8,9. Moreover, other useful effects of isoflavones in increasing survival rate and decreasing tumor volume have been reported in vivo ¹⁰. While the controversial effects of isoflavones have been investigated in multiple studies, the interference of these nonnutritive agents with chemotherapeutic drugs has been rarely reported so far.

In most experimental studies, where the association of soy isoflavones and breast cancer risk has been investigated, a single component, e.g., genistein or daidzein was employed ⁹. But total extracts of isoflavone compared with a single component might exert different in vivo effects in metabolism ⁹. In addition, synergistic effects among different components of soy isoflavones may occur in vivo.

Hence, the aim of this study was to examine the probable effects of soy isoflavone extract on the tumor volume, diet consumption and survival rate of classic chemotherapeutic reagent docetaxel on mouse 4T1 breast tumor model.

Cell culture: The 4T1 mouse mammary tumor cell line (estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, National Cell Bank of Iran, Pasteur Institute, Tehran, Iran) was cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco BRL Inc., Grand Island, NY, USA), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin/ streptomycin, 1 mM pyruvate and 2 mML-glutamine and maintained in humidified incubator at 37°C in 5% CO₂ atmosphere. Tumor cell suspensions greater than 90% viability were prepared from subconfluent cultures with 0.25% trypsin (Invitrogen, CA, USA) and 0.02% EDTA.

Animals: Female BALB/c mice, 6 to 7 weeks old, were purchased from Pasteur Institute of Iran animal facility and kept in a pathogen- free animal facility at Avicenna Research Institute. The animals were housed at standard conditions (24°C temperature and 12 hr light/ 12 hr dark cycles) and allowed to acclimatize for 1 week before starting any experiments. The study was approved by the ethical committees of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Avicenna Research Institute.

In vivo xenograft model of breast cancer: Early passage 4T1 cells (5×10⁵) were suspended in 100 μl of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and injected into the second mammary fat pad of 60 female BALB/c mice. Tumor growth was then assessed twice weekly using vernier calipers, and tumor volumes were calculated by the formula: 

V (mm³)=L (major axis)´W2 (minor axis)⁄2. At this step, all mice were fed purified American Institute of Nutrition 93 maintenance (AIN 93M) diet, in which soy oil was substituted with corn oil, until treatment time. This diet was used to meet all the requirements of rodents ¹¹. The food intake and the weight of the mice were measured twice a week. For measurement of the diet consumption, mice were kept in separate cages and allowed to eat and drink ad libitum and the leftover was weighed.

When the tumor volume reached around 50-100 mm³, the mice were randomly divided to four groups (15 per group): the control group, the dietary soy isoflavones extract group (SIE), the intravenous docetaxel injection group (DOCE) and the combination group of dietary soy isoflavones extract and intravenous docetaxel injection (DOCE+SIE). For groups that were treated with soyisoflavones extract, 100 mg soy isoflavones extract was added to AIN 93 M. With this supplementation the concentration of isoflavones would be approximately 0.5 mol/µl in murine blood ¹², which equates to the level of soy consumption among women in their diets ¹³. Docetaxel (10 mg/kg) was injected intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 after dividing the mice into groups. The other two groups received sterile PBS on the same days. One week after the last injection, 7 mice from each group were sacrificed and tumors were excised and after fixation in nitrogen, they were stored at -80°C. The other 8 mice in each group were monitored for survival rate analysis until they died.

Western blot analysis of MKI67 expression: Sample tissues were homogenized in Ripa lysis buffer (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) on ice using pellet pestle (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) for 15 min and then centrifuged for 15 min at 13,000×g at 4°C. The supernatants were collected and stored at -80°C until use. BCA assay (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) was applied to measure the protein concentration according to manufacturer’s instructions. Sample buffer, with 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, was added to 40 mg protein per lane and boiled for 2 min. The samples were then separated on 5% SDS-PAGE gel with a 3% stacking gel for 220 min at 80 V and then transferred to the nitrocellulose membrane to determine MKI67 expression, as a marker for cell proliferation. The membranes were blocked overnight with 5% skim milk in PBS with 0.05% Tween-20 (PBST). Anti-Mki67 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab15580) was used to probe the membranes for 2 hr. The membranes were subsequently washed with PBST (4×15 min) and incubated with 1:8000 dilution of peroxidase-conjugated sheep anti-rabbit antibody (Avicenna Research Institute, Tehran, Iran).

After repeating the washing step, the resulting signal was visualized using ECL Detection kit (ECL Select Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Lysates of Hella cells were used as the positive control for MKI67. Pre-immune rabbit serum was applied instead of primary antibodies in negative control lanes. To ensure equal protein loading, tumor lysates including 40 mg protein from each tumor sample were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gels to determine β-actin expression.

Total RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis: Total RNA was extracted from mouse breast tumor samples using a commercial RNA extraction kit (GeneAll, Biotechnology, Seoul, Korea) based on glass fiber membrane technology, according to the manufacturer's instructions. First, RNA quality was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis, and then RNA quantity and purity were determined by measuring its absorbance at A260 nm and A260/A280 ratio, respectively. The cDNA was synthesized from total RNA by M-MuLV reverse transcriptase and N6 random hexamer. For synthesis of cDNA, 1 μg of total RNA, treated with DNase, was heated at 60°C for 5 min followed by cooling on ice. Master mixture included 4 μl of 5´ reverse transcriptase buffer, 10 mM of each dNTP, 20 pM N6 random hexamer, 1 µl RiboLockTMRNase inhibitor, 200 U of M-MuLV reverse transcriptase, and DEPC-treated water to a final volume of 20 µl. The temperature profile for the cDNA synthesis was 25°C for 10 min, 42°C for 1 hr and final heating up to 72°C for 10 min (all reagents were from Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania).

Real time PCR: Analysis of MKI67 gene expression was performed using SYBR green (Takara BIO, Inc., Otsu City, Shiga, Japan) real time PCR. The TATA box binding protein (Tbp), a housekeeping gene, was used as endogenous control.

Two specific primer pairs for MKI67 and Tbp genes were designed using primer 3 software program. The product length of MKI67 using the forward primer 5’-GACAGCTTCCAAAGCTCACC-3’ and the reverse primer 5’-TGTGTCCTTAGCTGCCTCCT-3’ was 230 bp. Amplification of Tbp gene was performed using forward primer 5’-AAGGGAGAATCATGGACCA GAAC-3’ and reverse primer 5’-GGTGTTCTGAATA GGCTGTGGAG-3’ which produced a fragment of 149 bp. Briefly, 2 ml of cDNA were mixed with 1×SYBR Premix EX Taq^TM, 0.2 mM of each primer and 0.4 ml ROX passive reference dye. The amplification was performed in a Rotor-Gene Q real time PCR (QIAGEN, Inc., CA, USA.) as follows: an initial denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s, 60°C for 34 s and 78°C for 5 s. For relative quantification of expression of each gene in tumor cells, the following arithmetic formula was used: 2-^ΔΔCT (Perkin-Elmer Instruction manual, 1997), where the amount of target gene (MKi67) was normalized to Tbp (housekeeping gene) and the relative expression of a gene in tumor was calculated in relation to the mean value of target gene expression in the control group.

Statistical analysis: Data from diet consumption and tumor volume were analyzed using Friedman test followed by Dunn's post hoc test.

MKI67 mRNA expression was analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Also survival analyses were performed using Mantel-Cox method and long-rank test for trend. Differences were considered significant at a p-value of <0.05. All statistical analyses were done using the graphpad prism 5 software program (Graphpad Software. San Diego, CA).

Diet consumption in defined groups: Diet consumption was significantly different among groups (p=0.005) (Figure 1). In this regard, diet consumption in DOCE+SIE was significantly higher than DOCE group.

While diet consumption in SIE group was higher than that in the control group, this difference was not significant.

Survival analysis in defined groups: In survival analysis (Figure 2), the mean survival times in the control, SIE, DOCE and DOCE+SIE groups were 33.3±2.7, 34.7±2.1, 38±1.7 and 40.4±2 days, respectively. While lifespan did not differ significantly between groups (p=0.34), the DOCE+SIE group had the longest lifespan among the groups.

Breast tumor volume: Figure 3 shows that there were no significant differences between tumor volumes of the groups. A slight decrease in tumor volume was seen in DOCE+SIE group compared to DOCE group. Soy isoflavone extract exerted no effect on tumor volume in SIE group compared to the control group. The means of tumor volume in control, SIE, DOCE and DOCE+SIE groups were 221±111, 235±114, 166±79 and 148±74 mm³, respectively.

Gene and protein expressions of MKI67: No significant differences in MKi67gene expressions were observed among the groups.  However, it seems that SIE may induce MKI67 mRNA expression and thereby cell proliferation (Figure 4). In western blot analysis two bands of 345 and 395 kDa, related to MKI67 protein were detected. The lowest expression of MKI67 protein was seen in DOCE+SIE group and an increase in its expression in DOCE was observed in SIE and the control groups, respectively.

Chemotherapy is the most common therapy among cancer patients ¹⁴. However, chemotherapy has been known to induce toxicity and drug resistance in cancer cells, causing treatment failure ⁵. Using a nontoxic agent with a different mechanism of action in combination with chemotherapy agents is imperative in order to promote new regimens that can augment the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents and reduce their toxicities ¹⁵. Soy isoflavones, nontoxic flavonoid compounds, are dietary agents that have been reported to prevent cancer and may increase the efficacy of cancer treatment by modifying the activity of key survival pathways and cell proliferation ¹⁶. Different patterns of anti-tumor activity have been proposed for single isoflavones compared to their combinations ⁸. In this regard, the present study was conducted to compare the anti-tumor effects of soy isoflavone extract alone and in combination with docetaxel on 4T1 cell-line induced murine breast cancer model.

Appetite and immune status are significantly decreased in cancer patients ¹⁷. Pro-inflammatory cytokines from tumors are associated with fatigue, anorexia, cachexia pain and resistance to treatment that reduce the quality of life for cancer patients which is further significantly reduced during chemotherapy due to a wide range of side effects such as decrease of appetite and vomiting ¹⁸. Our results showed that diet consumption in DOCE+SIE group was significantly higher than that in DOCE group. The results are in agreement with those of Rohr et al’s ¹⁷ who found that daily consumption of fermented soy significantly increased appetite and decreased cytokine TNF-α level in cancer patient sera during chemotherapy compared to placebo group. Reduction of cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6) due to soy isoflavone consumption may be another possible explanation ¹⁹.

Several studies have shown that consumption of soy products improve survival rate and decrease risk of death and recurrence of cancer among women with breast cancer ^20-22. The improvement in nutritional status can improve survival. The beneficial effects of soy consumption on the cardiovascular system, bone health and degenerative arthritis has been reported in the literature ^{22, 23}.

However, higher but not significant diet consumption was observed when SIE was used alone in comparison to the control group. The toxic side effects of docetaxel may cause more suppressive effect on diet consumption and therefore SIE may be more effective on diet consumption in treated groups in comparison with untreated groups.

Previous report has showed that treatment of NB4 and HL-60 xenograft mice with soy isoflavone genistein combined with chemotherapy agent significantly increased survival time in comparison to untreated control group. In this study, no significant differences were found in survival times among the four groups. The non-significant improvement of survival time that was found in our study may be due to several factors such as use of low-dose docetaxel and more aggressive and metastatic character of 4T1 breast cancer than other kinds of breast cancer ⁶.

Although epidemiologic study has reported that soy protection against breast cancer is independent at the Estrogen Receptor (ER) status, irrespective of whether a breast cancer is ER-negative or ER-positive ²⁰, inconsistent data exist on the effects of pure phytoestrogens or soy products on breast tumor progression. While in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activities of genistein have been reported in different types of breast cancer ^8,18, some studies have shown the stimulating effect of genistein on the tumor growth of ER-positive breast cancer ²⁴. Promoting and inhibitory effects of daidzin on ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer cells have been found in several studies ^18,25. This discrepancy may be due to the use of specific isoflavones alone instead of combination of soy isoflavones. In support of this theory, Kim et al ⁹ compared the effect of diets containing soy extract and genistein on the growth of implanted estrogen-independent human breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) in female BALB/c mice. It was reported that the effect of soy extract in inhibiting tumor growth was more potent than genistein. This result may be due to the synergistic effect of different bioactive components in the soy extract.

It was reported that tumor growth of estrogen-unresponsive (MDA-MB-231) and estrogen-dependent (MCF-7) human breast cancer xenografts in athymic mice was not affected by phytoestrogens-containing soy extract. Similarly, Martinez-Montemayor et al ¹⁸ stated that combined soy isoflavones had no effect on primary tumor growth in a mouse breast cancer model. Consistent with these reports, our results showed that tumor (volume) was not affected by soy isoflavone extract and there were no significant differences between the soy isoflavone and the control groups. Though the tumor volume in DOCE+SIE group was lower than that in DOCE group, this difference was not significant. These results could be in line with our findings in western blot, which showed that in mice treated with DOCE+SIE, expression of MKI67 was lower than that in DOCE group and also there were no differences in MKI67protein expression between SIE and control groups. However, the basic mRNA expression level of  MKI67 was not significantly different among groups. Our results confirm the findings of previous study ²⁵ that there were no significant differences in the expression of MKI67 in estrogen-dependent mice, received 25 g/kg soy isoflavone extract, in comparison with the control. It is suggested that the discrepancy between MKI67 mRNA levels and protein levels in DOCE+SIE group could be due to non translational regulation and intracellular storage of mRNA which is affected by such interaction ²⁶.

In conclusion, our results showed that combined therapy with docetaxel had synergistic effects on diet consumption.

The survey was supported by National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute of Iran.

Larger Image High Resolution Figure 1. The rate of diet consumption every 4 days in different mouse groups (15 per group). Significant difference in consumption rate between DOCE+SIE and DOCE groups was detected. Control group received AIN 93 M diet, the dietary soy isoflavone extract (SIE) group received AIN 93M diet+100 mg SIE, the intravenous docetaxel injection (DOCE) group received 10 mg/kg DOCE and the combination group received soy isoflavone extract and intravenous docetaxel injection (DOCE+SIE) *p<0.01.

Larger Image High Resolution Figure 2. Survival curves of 4T1 induced breast cancer mouse models in different treatment groups (8 per group). The mean survival times in the control, SIE, DOCE and DOCE+SIE groups were 33.3± 2.7, 34.7±2.1, 38±1.7 and 40.4±2 days, respectively. No significant differences were detected between groups.

Larger Image High Resolution Figure 3. Effect of soy isoflavone extract on tumor volume of 4T1 mice mammary fat pad tumors (15 per group). The means of tumor volume in control, SIE, DOCE and DOCE+SIE groups were 221± 111, 235±114, 166±79 and 148±74 mm3, respectively. No significant differences were detected between groups. Control group received AIN 93M diet, the dietary soy isoflavones extract (SIE) group received AIN 93 M diet+100 mg SIE, the intravenous docetaxel injection (DOCE) group received 10 mg/kg DOCE and the combination group received soy isoflavone extract and intravenous docetaxel injection (DOCE+SIE).

Larger Image High Resolution Figure 4. MKI67 mRNA and protein expressions in different groups. The control, the dietary Soy Isoflavones Extract (SIE), the intravenous docetaxel injection (DOCE) and the combination group of dietary soy isoflavone extract and intravenous docetaxel injection (DOCE+SIE) groups are shown. A) Relative expression of MKI67 gene in different groups; B) Western blot analysis of MKI67; C) β-actin. No significant differences between groups were detected.