An Overview of 3D Bioprinting as a Novel Strategy in the Field of Tissue Engineering

PDF - Export to EndNote - PubMed Central XML format - PubMed Central XML format

PMID: 30555650 (PubMed) - PMCID: PMC6252037 - View online: PubReader
Volume 10, Issue 4, October-December , Page 201 to 201
Wednesday, September 26, 2018 :Received , Wednesday, September 26, 2018 :Accepted

  • Corresponding author Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran, Tell: +21 22432020, Email:
    - Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran


Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine have typically matured from benchtop ideas to commercially applicable products in the clinic 1. However, despite of typical advances in tissue engineering field, some limitations such as no reproducibility, no control of structure geometry including pore size and pore distribution and no integrity of cell distribution and migration in the construct have impelled the scientists into bioprinting technology. The most advantage of 3D bioprinting sounds to be precise fabrication of 3D deposition with controlled geometric structure and cells distribution 2. Over the past decade, lots of researches in bioprinting of different tissues and organs has been carried out using different bioprinting modalities particularly inkjet based printing for skin tissue engineering and extrusion based printing for 3D depositions like bone, cartilage, heart, liver and heart valve. The key factor in extrusion-based bioprinting is bioink preparation, cell encapsulation in the bioink and bioprinting procedure. Indeed, preparation of bioink with appropriate gelation rate, suitable mechanical strength and elasticity which preserve cell viability and proliferation is the most challenge of bioprinting technology. So far, different strategies such as dual bioink cross-linkers, multi-step polymerization and using of core-shell nozzle have been reported to improve viability, quality and functionality of the printed product 3. However, some issues including creation of constructs supporting in vivo vascularization, scaling up tissue constructs and in situ bioprinting have been remained to resolve. A few bioprinting products have been commercialized especially in orthopedic and skin tissue engineering fields and given the fast development of this industry over the past years; it supposed that the bioprinting products will eventually take a big proportion of the medical market to help patients suffering from a wide range of diseases in the future.




References :
  1. Mobini S, Khanmohammadi M, Heidari-Vala H, Samadikuchaksaraei A, Moshiri A, Kazemnejad S. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine in Iran: Current State of Research and Future Outlook. Mol Biotechnol 2015;57(7):589-605.   [PubMed]
  2. Derakhshanfar S, Mbeleck R, Xu K, Zhang X, Zhong W, Xing M. 3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: A review of recent trends and advances. Bioact Mater 2018;3(2):144-156.   [PubMed]
  3. Zhang YS, Arneri A, Bersini S, Shin SR, Zhu K, Goli-Malekabadi Z, et al. Bioprinting 3D microfibrous scaffolds for engineering endothelialized myocardium and heart-on-a-chip. Biomaterials 2016;110:45-59.   [PubMed]